Tag Archives: The Avengers

Logical Conditions, Assemble!

About a year ago, I saw the film adaptation of Thor, and I did not like it very much. In fact, I found it to be an unfortunate but necessary piece of the larger puzzle that became The Avengers. I saw The Avengers Tuesday evening, and while enjoyable, it reminded me of the comparison I made between it and the logical reasoning portion of the Law School Admissions Test.

Here is some of what I had to say about necessity, sufficiency, and Thor:

When preparing for the Law School Admissions Test, one of the most important concepts to master is the difference between necessity and sufficiency. For a statement to be true, certain conditions need to be satisfied. Other conditions that might be satisfied are sufficient to assure the statement’s veracity but might not be required to confirm the statement.

Thor is necessary, but it is not sufficient. The Marvel Studios endgame is next year’s release of The Avengers, a cinematic adaptation of the superhero stable that includes—at a minimum—Iron Man, the Incredible Hulk, Captain America, and Thor. Since 2008′s Iron Man Marvel has been building toward The Avengers by steadily rolling out the members of the team in their own film. After all, when The Avengers unite early in the second act of next year’s bonanza, a little backstory could go a long way.

There is also the task of keeping tabs on each hero, love interest, sidekick, and post-credit scene that teases the next chapter in the franchise. With Thor, it was Jackson making his requisite appearance and introducing some mysterious device that offers “power, maybe unlimited.” Ooh, scary. This isn’t entertainment; it’s fucking work.

So scratch that tidbit in your notebook, it will surely come up next year when Marvel delivers The Avengers. If that movie is a stool, Thor is one of its legs—required for the finished product to stand, but ugly with splintered edges and too much paint. There can be no Avengers without Thor (a comic-book devotee would surely tell me here that there are less Nordic iterations of the stable), but as a piece it is quite lacking. But you have to see it anyway. And you have to see Captain America. And revisit the Iron Man series and The Incredible Hulk. How can you successfully take in The Avengers if you haven’t done your homework. Look for me at a screening next summer. I’ll be the one passing out cheat sheets.

To my surprise, I very much enjoyed The Avengers. I wouldn’t dare say it is an experience for Marvel newbies, but it is not the crowded soup I feared. I’ll post my fuller thoughts on the movie when it is released Friday.

Time to Cash Out the Marvel Ponzi Scheme

In May, I got really mad at Marvel Studios and Paramount Pictures for the dreadful Thor. Of that movie’s several “accomplishments,” its greatest was proving correct A.O. Scott’s theory that the recent crop Marvel films—Iron ManThe Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Thor, and Captain America: The First Avenger—are a great Ponzi scheme leading up to The Avengers in 2012.

In that Thor post, I compared the Marvel series to one of the guiding principles of the multiple-choice portion of the Law School Admissions Test. On the LSAT, test-takers are advised to evaluate scenarios and determine if certain conditions are necessary, sufficient, neither, or both. For example, in defining the paramaters of, say, an omelette, eggs are a necessary component. But the presence of eggs alone is not sufficient. To become an omelette, the eggs must be cracked open, have their contents whipped and blended, fried in an open skillet, and folded in half before serving.

Likewise, Thor is a necessary component of The Avengers, but the movie was not sufficient entertainment in its own right. However, Marvel is banking that it was. Based on the trailer for The Avengers released today, the primary villain appears to be Loki, the Norse god of mischief and—in the Marvel Universe—adopted brother of Thor. This suggests that even with the presence of Iron Man, Captain America, the Hulk, Hawkeye, Black Widow, and Nick Fury, the plot of The Avengers will be driven largely by Thor, who in his own feature was a bland character played by a fairly dull actor (Chris Hemsworth).

For those overwhelmed by the requirement of seeing five prerequisite films, I promised cheat sheets ahead of The Avengers. Here is the first set of tips:

  • Played by Robert Downey Jr., Tony Stark is actually entertaining to watch.
  • Gwyneth Paltrow was in Iron Man and Iron Man 2, she appears to be missing now.
  • Mark Ruffalo is the third actor in as many films to play the Hulk/Bruce Banner. Don’t worry about it, no one liked the first two anyway.
  • Thor is that guy who was blown up at the beginning of Star Trek.
  • Hawkeye didn’t get his own movie. He was just there in Thor with his compound bow and deadly arrows. By the way, why is a special forces operative using a bow and arrow and not, you know, a gun?
  • Captain America and Iron Man won’t get along at first.
  • Scarlett Johannson wears a catsuit.
  • Something called the Cosmic Cube is the MacGuffin.
  • Chumps like me actually paid nearly $60 to see each of these films at least once and we’ll probably shell out another $12 to $15 (3D!) to see The Avengers.